Last week, a couple of my friends and I went up to Baguio City to check up on the environmental situation there.
Although we were convinced that we had a pretty good idea of what was happening in the country's Summer Capital, we believed it was necessary to check our assumptions against the reality on the ground.
As social media pundits, there is an enormous temptation to just believe one's own take on things and reject stuff that goes against our views. This happens especially when you make a call on an issue and things turn out in a way that sort of prove that your opinion on the matter was right. If you manage to figure things out correctly a lot of times, it can get you thinking that... well... you are right all the time about a lot of things.
Sometimes, figuring things out correctly lots of times and popularizing one's view on issues can get people a bit of fame. And, fame can be addicting, so much so that people try to cling to vestiges of their fame even after most people have forgotten why they were famous. And it's sad, really.
The cure for that is to focus on what should be the real reason -- the only reason -- why people go into punditry and that is a commitment to telling the truth.
So, what's the truth about the environmental situation in Baguio City?
When we got up to Baguio City, one of the first things we did was to seek out the opinions of people who live there and who are concerned about the plight of Baguio City.
I was thankful to have reconnected with a former colleague at the Senate who has been living in Baguio for the past four years and he pretty much revalidated some of the ideas we had about what was going on.
Another person whom we got in touch with was Grace Bandoy, a member of the Baguio community who is pretty much active in the environmental preservation movements.
Grace and my former colleague both pointed out that it seems people up in Baguio have their eyes focused everywhere else except the more crucial areas which is bound to hit them hard sooner or later.
As the stories go, a small group of individuals funded by businessmen and politicians are raising a howl over the cutting of 60 trees in an urban area while 80 hectares of Benguet's forests are disappearing every year.
One glaring case in point is the ongoing destruction of the Sto. Tomas watershed, which is supposed to be a
forest reserve -- which, to me, means that it should be untouched.
My friend,
JP Fenix, has already written about the situation in the Sto. Tomas watershed and its a pretty good primer, if you will, of the kind of thinking that leads to environmental disasters.
The long and short of what may happen to the Sto. Tomas watershed is clearly depicted in this picture of Quirino Hill.
What you see up there will be what will happen to the Sto. Tomas watershed if people in Baguio don't do anything and remain distracted.